|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
Data corrente: |
08/03/2012 |
Data da última atualização: |
20/05/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
ZOTTI, M. J.; GRÜTZMACHER, A. D.; GRÜTZMACHER, D. D.; DALMAZO, G. O.; MARTINS, J. F. da S. |
Afiliação: |
MOISÉS JOÃO ZOTTI, UFPEL; ANDERSON DIONEI GRÜTZMACHER, UFPEL; DOUGLAS DANIEL GRÜTZMACHER, UFPEL; GABRIEL OLLÉ DALMAZO, UFPEL; JOSE FRANCISCO DA SILVA MARTINS, CPACT. |
Título: |
Seletividade de inseticidas usados na cultura do milho para ninfas e adultos do predador Doru lineare (Eschscholtz, 1822) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) em condições de semi-campo. |
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Brasileira de Agrociência, Pelotas, v. 14, n. 3, p. 96-105, jul./set. 2008. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Foi avaliada a seletividade dos principais inseticidas utilizados na cultura do milho ao predador Doru lineare (Eschscholtz, 1822) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) seguindo metodologia da IOBC/WPRS em condições de semi-campo. Ninfas e adultos provenientes da criação de laboratório foram colocadas no interior do cartucho de plantas de milho. Logo após foi realizada a pulverização dos inseticidas com um equipamento costal pressurizado com CO2 pressão de 50psi. Após a pulverização as plantas de milho foram cobertas com tecido em recipiente adequado. Avaliando-se as mortalidades para adultos e ninfas, após 72 horas, verificou-se que: Certero, Intrepid 240 SC e Mimic 240 SC são inócuos (classe 1), Dimilin e Karate Zeon 250 CS são levemente nocivos (classe 2) e Engeo Pleno é moderadamente nocivo (classe 3); Decis 25 EC, Fastac 100 SC, Match EC e Neem Azal são, inócuos (classe 1) e levemente nocivos ( classe 2), respectivamente para adultos e ninfas. Lorsban 480 BR e Sevin 480 SC são moderadamente nocivos (classe 3) e nocivos (classe 4), respectivamente; inseticida Tracer é levemente nocivo (classe 2) e moderadamente nocivo (classe 3), para adultos e ninfas, respectivamente. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Inimigos naturais; Manejo integrado de pragas; Toxicidade. |
Thesagro: |
Zea Mays. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Insecta. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/55454/1/15428.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02002naa a2200229 a 4500 001 1918112 005 2020-05-20 008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aZOTTI, M. J. 245 $aSeletividade de inseticidas usados na cultura do milho para ninfas e adultos do predador Doru lineare (Eschscholtz, 1822) (Dermaptera$bForficulidae) em condições de semi-campo.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2008 520 $aFoi avaliada a seletividade dos principais inseticidas utilizados na cultura do milho ao predador Doru lineare (Eschscholtz, 1822) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) seguindo metodologia da IOBC/WPRS em condições de semi-campo. Ninfas e adultos provenientes da criação de laboratório foram colocadas no interior do cartucho de plantas de milho. Logo após foi realizada a pulverização dos inseticidas com um equipamento costal pressurizado com CO2 pressão de 50psi. Após a pulverização as plantas de milho foram cobertas com tecido em recipiente adequado. Avaliando-se as mortalidades para adultos e ninfas, após 72 horas, verificou-se que: Certero, Intrepid 240 SC e Mimic 240 SC são inócuos (classe 1), Dimilin e Karate Zeon 250 CS são levemente nocivos (classe 2) e Engeo Pleno é moderadamente nocivo (classe 3); Decis 25 EC, Fastac 100 SC, Match EC e Neem Azal são, inócuos (classe 1) e levemente nocivos ( classe 2), respectivamente para adultos e ninfas. Lorsban 480 BR e Sevin 480 SC são moderadamente nocivos (classe 3) e nocivos (classe 4), respectivamente; inseticida Tracer é levemente nocivo (classe 2) e moderadamente nocivo (classe 3), para adultos e ninfas, respectivamente. 650 $aInsecta 650 $aZea Mays 653 $aInimigos naturais 653 $aManejo integrado de pragas 653 $aToxicidade 700 1 $aGRÜTZMACHER, A. D. 700 1 $aGRÜTZMACHER, D. D. 700 1 $aDALMAZO, G. O. 700 1 $aMARTINS, J. F. da S. 773 $tRevista Brasileira de Agrociência, Pelotas$gv. 14, n. 3, p. 96-105, jul./set. 2008.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Territorial. |
Data corrente: |
09/05/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
09/05/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
BARROSO, P. A. V.; GODINHO, V. de P. C. |
Afiliação: |
PAULO AUGUSTO VIANNA BARROSO, CNPM; VICENTE DE PAULO CAMPOS GODINHO, CPAF-RO. |
Título: |
Reassessment of exclusion zones of GM cotton in Brazil: the case of Rondônia State. |
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE BIOSAFETY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS, 15.,2019, Tarragona, Espanha. Book of Abstracts...Tarragona: International Society for Biosafety Research, 2019. |
Páginas: |
p. 107. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) was the second crop to received commercial approval to planting GM cultivars in Brazil, in 2005. At that time, the main concern was the possibility of gene flow from GM cottons to affect in situ maintenance of others species sexually compatible ? G. barbadense and G. mustelinum. To avoid this problem, the National Biosafety Technical Commision (CTNBio) conditioned the cultivation of GM cotton to the creation of GM Cotton Exclusion Zones, where just non-GM cultivars could be planted. Cotton cultivation is an important agricultural activity in Brazil and the producers are almost unanimous: fields of GM cultivars yield more, the management is less laborious and the protection against weeds and pests is higher. For these reasons, farmers in the Rondonia, a state included into the exclusion zones, requested CTNBio to remove Rondônia from the exclusion zones. To deliberate, CTNBio asked Embrapa for information. To properly answer, an expedition was performed in 20 of the state?s 52 municipalities, and only one species was found, Gossypium barbadense. Plants were present just in higly anthropized areas, mainly in dooryards of urban and rural houses, and they were maintained as medicinal plants. Plants of G. barbadense were found in 5% to 10% of the houses, protected from gene flow by walls, houses, and trees. There was no signal of interespecifc crossing, even in municipalities were conventional Gossypium hirsutum were planted. The main risk to in situ mainatenance of G. barbadense is the loss of cultural habits resulting from the expansion of the public health care, which increases the use of chemical drugs over medicinal plants. In conclusion, gene flow is not a significant concern to the preservation of Gossypium barbadense in Rondônia, and there is no reason for the state to remain as an exclusion zones. MenosCotton (Gossypium hirsutum) was the second crop to received commercial approval to planting GM cultivars in Brazil, in 2005. At that time, the main concern was the possibility of gene flow from GM cottons to affect in situ maintenance of others species sexually compatible ? G. barbadense and G. mustelinum. To avoid this problem, the National Biosafety Technical Commision (CTNBio) conditioned the cultivation of GM cotton to the creation of GM Cotton Exclusion Zones, where just non-GM cultivars could be planted. Cotton cultivation is an important agricultural activity in Brazil and the producers are almost unanimous: fields of GM cultivars yield more, the management is less laborious and the protection against weeds and pests is higher. For these reasons, farmers in the Rondonia, a state included into the exclusion zones, requested CTNBio to remove Rondônia from the exclusion zones. To deliberate, CTNBio asked Embrapa for information. To properly answer, an expedition was performed in 20 of the state?s 52 municipalities, and only one species was found, Gossypium barbadense. Plants were present just in higly anthropized areas, mainly in dooryards of urban and rural houses, and they were maintained as medicinal plants. Plants of G. barbadense were found in 5% to 10% of the houses, protected from gene flow by walls, houses, and trees. There was no signal of interespecifc crossing, even in municipalities were conventional Gossypium hirsutum were planted. The main risk to in situ m... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Gossypium barbadense. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/197238/1/5070.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02465nam a2200145 a 4500 001 2108936 005 2019-05-09 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aBARROSO, P. A. V. 245 $aReassessment of exclusion zones of GM cotton in Brazil$bthe case of Rondônia State.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE BIOSAFETY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS, 15.,2019, Tarragona, Espanha. Book of Abstracts...Tarragona: International Society for Biosafety Research$c2019 300 $ap. 107. 520 $aCotton (Gossypium hirsutum) was the second crop to received commercial approval to planting GM cultivars in Brazil, in 2005. At that time, the main concern was the possibility of gene flow from GM cottons to affect in situ maintenance of others species sexually compatible ? G. barbadense and G. mustelinum. To avoid this problem, the National Biosafety Technical Commision (CTNBio) conditioned the cultivation of GM cotton to the creation of GM Cotton Exclusion Zones, where just non-GM cultivars could be planted. Cotton cultivation is an important agricultural activity in Brazil and the producers are almost unanimous: fields of GM cultivars yield more, the management is less laborious and the protection against weeds and pests is higher. For these reasons, farmers in the Rondonia, a state included into the exclusion zones, requested CTNBio to remove Rondônia from the exclusion zones. To deliberate, CTNBio asked Embrapa for information. To properly answer, an expedition was performed in 20 of the state?s 52 municipalities, and only one species was found, Gossypium barbadense. Plants were present just in higly anthropized areas, mainly in dooryards of urban and rural houses, and they were maintained as medicinal plants. Plants of G. barbadense were found in 5% to 10% of the houses, protected from gene flow by walls, houses, and trees. There was no signal of interespecifc crossing, even in municipalities were conventional Gossypium hirsutum were planted. The main risk to in situ mainatenance of G. barbadense is the loss of cultural habits resulting from the expansion of the public health care, which increases the use of chemical drugs over medicinal plants. In conclusion, gene flow is not a significant concern to the preservation of Gossypium barbadense in Rondônia, and there is no reason for the state to remain as an exclusion zones. 650 $aGossypium barbadense 700 1 $aGODINHO, V. de P. C.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Territorial (CNPM) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|